Time Magazine has gone too far.
This is the current cover of Time magazine that is causing some controversy at the moment.
I’m normally all for shock tactics but this just feels wrong. I understand that Time magazine has a remit to cover things that are of interest on an international level, which of course breast feeding is, but to raise it with such a provocative photo smacks of commercialism and feels like it misses the point. In countries where breast feeding is the only option because bad water or no water make formula trickier, it be interesting to know how old kids are when they move on from the breast. So with that thought perhaps the use of shock tactics is valid as I’m not only thinking about the debate but writing about it. Can’t help think of David Walliams asking for ‘Bitty’ when I look at the picture though.
So what do you think – marketing gimmick or valid journalistic point?













